2023-07-22

ideo(to)logy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Ideology is the science of idiots"

 

 

 

 

 

- John Adams

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. apparently the putsch has been cancelled ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. or rather deferred, perhaps ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Smashing singularities.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tagging allies with unremarkable anarchies of calculated vibration.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All that defines Will bind.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no other way,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To force us to stay.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mind presses to skin, there’s no such thing as never been.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bind as faith.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Temples on my back.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toppling turrets with torrents rough as redemption.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No matter -
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

your call sign.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We all serve The Tower    
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All the same.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. beware of getting lost..








.. inside another person's dream ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. shades (.. thus named because such a name would supposedly help him maintain a low profile ..) was amused by this (arguably unintentional) double entendre, "bad actors", which has been used to refer to malicious individuals, but could also mean that they're just not great at deceit .. 











.. amusingly, both senses are technically valid in the case of certain people who, when con fronted by reality, prefer to s(l)ink into their (day)dreams, forging ideo(to)logies which are detrimental, to a greater or lesser extent ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. these "bad actors", motivated by flawed ideologies, are seeking to maintain the status quo, a state moreover that increasingly many have realized is untenable .. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. in fact, it is precisely by avoiding change & progress that such "useful idiots" will themselves become their inadvertent catalysts ..











.. unfortunately, it's gonna get worse before it improves, as long as those who don't learn stick to their ideo(to)logical guns instead ..


 











.. it was only when I stopped running ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. that @LL I was chasing caught up with me ..


























Taking a twist on spacetime transients and unusual events, is there anything we can do that causes unique events? Either to cycle back into our own experience or to land somewhere "out there" in the world-at-large? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We know that things occasionally happen that are out-of-place, or unique when taken in consideration with our more general routines and perceptions. But, is there some sort of mechanism we can use to elicit such responses from the universe? (besides ingesting questionable substances)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Submitted for acceptance / rejection: We have at least some control over our thoughts and actions, and we ourselves can intentionally do things that are out-of-the-ordinary or relatively unique among happenings. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We can make it a point to deviate from our routines or ways of doing things, to break the mold of physical and mental trackways in which we operate: the prisons without walls that have been built for us and that we ourselves have played a part in constructing. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do the cracks that we hammer out into our local spacetime - they at least enter other consciousnesses as "unique" - get paid back, so to speak?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe simply as small wonders creeping back into our experience. Not necessarily wonder at "big picture" items, for those are somewhat amorphous and more-or-less background considerations or scenes, but rather the little coincidences that usually go ignored. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For instance, you hurt your ankle and the next day while cleaning up find an old note written by someone else that says: "shotintheankle@gmail.com"- events that are in some sense related, separated in time & space, but that then become proximate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

These sorts of coincidences hint at additional hidden structure underlying our experience, but they usually do not lead into a more expansive psychic or material life. They pass, either unnoticed or noted, and leave little trace behind, since what much is there we can do with them other than that. We still do not have the magical mechanism that would enable us to make use of whatever structure causes coincidence in the first place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In order to even make an attempt at developing such a mechanism, we have to pay more attention to... our attention, and what we happen to notice and why. We do xyz and then awhile later some uvw happens. Something a bit different, or a little off - unusual. What did we happen to be thinking of at xyz and at uvw? Maybe, in a span of moments, we see answers on reflecting into the past to questions we are having "right now", possibly not at all related to the conversation at point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Considering the universe in the sense of a magic mirror, somewhat akin to a dream, reflecting ourselves back to us, we need to always consider what part of us is it that we are looking at "out there". When we do a thing, we have to think of what (interior) part of ourself it is that we are changing, rearranging. And that requires careful appreciation of the effects of an object's perception on our interior life and the whole system of consequences in which we find ourselves as a part. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even though for one event all causes and effects are infinite, maybe we can slip little hooks or nets of new forms into that flux and move things a little differently... like slapping a sigil on some oft-viewed bypass, or painting an alien on a yield sign. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anarchistic (unsanctioned) public works of art. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perceptual incongruities that may not need to be consciously noticed to DO SOMETHING™ - you can't help but look, but do you see: placing a rock diverts a stream.























.. everything ends ..






.. & that's the best thing, & it's the worst thing.. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. that can be said ..











2023-06-21

.. innocence (in no sense) ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"One who creates should be especially wary of success, though needs it"


 

 

 

 

- CG Jung, the Black Books


























A stone, excelled to the ocean
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convicted for resembling the spirit of its people.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The fires are lit, the homes are ash.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The songs grow sad, the tongue forgot.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The dance as gifted a call with a string.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tomorrow buried beneath concrete,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where the exhaust muffles the cries.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Souls bridled with treaties of rot.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Until an ocean of grief scores thundering waves.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhuming a stone, braving a face,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Releasing a congregation,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To raid the shores of commerce,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Releasing a contagion,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Armed with a fury of forgiveness.



















 








One thing and then another: perceptibility is always mutual, we deal with the world by making mental machines. YET ONCE AGAIN FOLKS!!:- the magical deposition of the self in (a) space! We are some(w| )here(?), but where? And where the fuck are you? Right now, I'm sitting on a couch typing somewhere in those finest not quite United States. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's a tad dreary; low energy, you get the gist. And that couch, goddammit, had better know I'm there or I'll be falling through it to the floor... then on to outer space or something I guess. In any event, the couch and myself have some mutual understanding that I'm (some sort of|a) human and it's a couch - that bounces a bit if you jump on it...  But I may have gone a bit overboard with saying perceptibility is always mutual... maybe I should have said that a mutual relation always has within it the possibility for bidirectional apprehension of the other.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Call and response - you know there's an extended body already, right? - My outward going sensory complex meets the world, and the world reacts upon my sensibilities, and emotions etc. I push out, the world pushes back... maybe? Usually? fortunately, I'd hope. Maybe a little push here or there can bring me what I want; after all, everything(?) the will accomplishes is through moving some type of shit around. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unless I'm what I characterize as a plant, I have to move this body to get some digs and feed myself. Maybe I have to push through thorns to grab some berries, or chip a rock into the tip of a spear. Or maybe walk down to the supermarket and exchange some human energy tokens for an orange or something. We push, pull, poke, or prod some thing and we shift the trajectory for that bundle of stuff. NAY! We shift the entire universe for that thing in all its relations extends into both the infinity of (just our?) space and (our?) time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And, don't get me wrong, moving shit around isn't just confined to putting a potato chip in your mouth. In the world of mind we can push concepts around, combining them into trains of thought, which probably have to loop off into infinite recess if one ever gets going. I can grab a mental structure, not thinking in terms of thought forms ATM ($$$), and search for connections to some other idea, tangibly expressed or otherwise. I direct my mind - really I don't separate mind and bodily perceptions, but here we'll separate the two since they can be more-or-less bisected from the unitary perception - (or it is directed for me) to something: a word. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This seed or condensation of the whole universal expanse into a succinct series of phonemes, though it may ossify and separate from the general mass, still retains all its links in the conceptual space. These trails and dangling threads can be followed, like a monkey swinging on his vine through a jungle of thoughts somewhere. On the page our letters and their combinatorics are records of various histories: Roman Letters.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Books of Law and commercial ledgers - marks scrawled on magic paper that dictate realms of action: We live inside these organisms that we've created for ourselves, if not also our physical bodies, then those extended systems of law and economy. Maybe machines? They are only natural as having arisen from people themselves, and it should be remembered that those people were NOT you. And in so far as we are constrained by the operating procedures of the social organism - we are cells, or the energy that feeds these things. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know, moving around and doing shit........... Not even that alone though, the actual environments in which we live are built out of people's energy and labor - usually ones we do not and will never know. Who built your house, huh? What about that pan where you fried some eggs and how in freaking hell did that olive oil get here? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unless it has nothing to do with people, and even then unless a wild dog bites you or no-one planted that tree, there were a whole mess of people variously involved in literally taking stuff from one place to some other place and fabricating whatever, maybe only a fractional piece of some final product, that eventually you plop over some cash for it and take to your home - or drink / smoke it or whatever. Like a giant mechanical brain, where the people are cells and the streets are veins.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STEP BACK!:<- If a thing can perceive you, you can perceive it; if you know the operating space and are aware of your body in it. Really, I'm thinking about non-human, non-animal, entities, or those that only seem to be such... anyone remember Don Juan? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So if all we're doing is moving things around to make them unto our lik(ing|eness) we've got to have a stable nexus (body) from which we can push and pull. But who says we've got one body, eh? Well... not me anyways, but I'd better hope you know that already and that you've got one such body at least - bend that spoon goddammit! It's all a pushmi-pullyu but we've forgotten how to listen to (wild) animals, yet alone talk to them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STEP INTO THE 4TH DIMENSION!: so these bodies leave trails, not two ways about it, going from one place to another implies a path. We've got this long t(r)ail "behind" us - that's our personal history. And so does everyone else; they've got their backstory too. Each of the people we come into contact with, either walking down the street or while drinking in a dive, has been led there by some sort of story that actually extends WAY back into the past to our prime ancestors, but try not to think of Darwin here... 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now take a dip, so to speak, and imagine that we actually have control over this body - 'cause we do; unless you forgo freewill, and that's not what magic/life is all about. You should have realized it already, but we're in a choose-your-own-adventure novel and we're all coauthors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If we're leaving marks on reality with our choices, aren't we then some how like a pencil, or pen, really - I don't know how to erase the past other than to let the oncoming future wash it away, and it's probably not a good idea if it is possible: repressed memories, trauma, etc. don't really help people. But, can we pick up a big sloppy paint brush dripping with some turpentine and make this thing a bit more like Dali and Dada, instead of a series of switches and pushing each other's buttons? Maybe some kind of acid will do the trick. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Painting a picture with our thoughts and actions, through our bodies "and moving shit around"™️. We've got story lines and histories, factual ones and may-as-well-be-falsified recorded ones, and people are walking these story lines and sometimes getting into trouble together. Every story needs an antagonist, right? But, I at least, don't want to appear in every blockbuster action movie - give me something more like a 16th century alchemist in silent repose patiently watching some six month reaction taking place in an alembic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With our mental "machinery" there are different structures that variously pattern our activities and perceptions - don't go smashing them all to bits now, would you? - Two such conceptual summations pertaining here are the notions of "what is real" & "what is possible". First you should dismantle that bit about "what is real" - you're not being a very humble human if you think you know what is actually going on, now are you? - I'm just a man, not the universal architect - You know that quantum nonsense being used to build Teevees? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anywho, we've got a whole lot of assumptions going on that we regard as describing the factual reality that lies beyond our immediate apprehension. But really, we don't know. Using the admission that we really don't know what-the-fuck™️ is going on, and combining it with a distention of the possible, you can find some pretty strange stuff out there in that big mess of story lines. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You get into *real* trouble when you link up with a crew where the possible is outside the strictures of "the mass" (of [story line?] inertia). That "mass" points to a method, however, in that we can hook into the train as it keeps rolling on. It is easier to interface story arcs where there is repetition. Same old faces, you know? Gotta watch out for the randos that pop in just a minute, those can carry you away.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approach and recession - distance (in time & space). HEY YOU! Now you'd better drop that new-fangled hippie notion of the eternal NOW, godammit (for the time being) -> the more near a thing is, the more real it is, and reality is a bit tricky to bend (that spoon), now isn't it? But, if things that are far away [think of space] are less real, maybe more like a dream? then maybe we can work a bit of magic there by pulling in from that "possible space" out there, far way. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The possible is not real, but may become real according to the nature of that possibility. Seems probably easier with things that already move and don't have to be built or engineered. The local space of the real is actually very small. Take vision, for example, there is a very obvious frame where peripheral vision fades to black. For vision, the only thing that is real is within that field of view. Enter stage right: A bird passes across to left.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well, well, well - I think it's time to loop back and let this train disappear into the distance for awhile. PAY ATTENTION! It's already been said: The act of perception causes a change in the thing perceived; or, the feeling is mutual.




















 

 

 

 

 

 

.. shades (.. thus named randomly; arbitrarily, basically .. ; ) thought back to a time when he was possessed of innocence; in a sense ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. it struck him, the parallel between the development of individuals & that of cultures, societies & their technologies .. & the valid point that those critics of progress raise against this 'myth', that there always seem to remain intractable problems & challenges that seem to defy the most far-reaching & wide-ranging of innovations .. 










.. & it further struck him that there are two ways to look at such challenges: one could either see them as insurmountable obstacles, immovable objects that will not yield to force, or as temporary impediments for a view of progress that argues that these also will be overcome by new 'technologies', new (reified) ways of thinking about the world that have yet to be either developed or adapted on a large scale .. 










.. admittedly, looking at the state of the world today, it's surely the 'easier' route to think of progress as an outdated myth that's past its sell-by date .. but how many times has this same thought echoed in the past, & how many will think so in the future ..? .. surely it's clear that the world we now inhabit is so different from some in the past that it would seem to visitors from there like another planet, or even another dimension of reality altogether .. 










.. & yet, now as it was then, certain qualities & attributes of reality, the world, persist .. certain (inner or hidden, i.e. esoteric or occult) mysteries will not yield to a discursive, rational approach .. they must be apprehended subjectively, & assimilated into one's inner experience(s) to be 'known' at all ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

& when or where has there ever been a society or a culture that didn't somehow be lie ve in magic(k) ..? .. the short answer is that there has never been, nor will there ever be; not only that, but such self-styled ideological rivals as scientism, being the belief that *everything* falls under the scientific purview, & which once proclaimed the death of magic as such, are now in decline, even as the esoteric outlook and its ideas pervade every (social) medium ..

 

 

 

 








.. & so it will certainly be in the future .. whatever innovations, inventions, technologies or ideologies develop in time, there will always be a space for the inner & hidden matters, & there will always be seekers of initiation into & experience of these timeless & boundless mysteries ..











.. never mind electric sheep, do AI dreams predict the future..? .. no matter where we look, we will find the occult, the esoteric .. & those adepts of matters esoteric will without a doubt be the best prepared to meet such future chaLLenges con fidently wherever (& whenever) they find themselves ..

 


 

 





















.. don't fear success ..







.. but don't expect it to be exactly as you expect ..












This is where I am today…..
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

….islands away.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Never to stay.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Never not to try,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Never to truly be….here.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No more deals with distraught.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fountain pen head,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Struggles to skewer,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dreams to sea,
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Freya to invoke.












2023-05-20

retroshades

(or, be the eclipse you want to see in the world)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

.. the wrap-up that occurs with retrograde could be seen as the setting of a scene, time or era. A recapitulation that leads to a new beginning ..


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My bathroom sparkles like the stars I can’t clutch. 


 

 

 

 

 

A vision too tactile to inspire salvation trough reflection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

That’s the key we reject.  Apathy.
 
 

 

 

 

 

Nothing is safe beneath these lights.
 

 

 

 

 

 

Always a shadow to comfort me.
 

 

 

 

 

A slip in the stream, doesn’t it always seam?
 

 

 

 

 

A penance for pleasure, an appliance for me to railroad my escape into relief.
 

 

 

 

 

 

Well baby in a nutshell that’s just all I see.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pulling out hair in doubt. …..I thrive in the dive.
 

 

 

 

 

 

And there is no meat on the grass for me. Green to the bone.
 

 

 

 

 

 

When will it appear to me?
 

 

 

 

 

 

The {matter} isn’t how far we are, but rather how hard the try.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There’s an analogy in there, a punch towards tempered skies.
 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no way. All tense is past.     
 

 

 

 

 

 

Gaslight.
 

 

 

 

 

 

Stars sinking beyond always.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I grapple to pierce myths, but the sedation of lies tempers my resolve.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I cook labyrinths in my kitchen of try.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I spend faster than I can die.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I audition to fall. Endless unrealized ambitions.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anxiety is sanctuary to me. Because baby I can never see why you are so afraid, but I am always so frail. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And together we can make a pair of wait and see.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A tightrope of self-medication, strung between try and deny.
 

 

 

 

 

 

My bedroom breathes truths to me, repressed desires masturbated into fires.
 

 

 

 

 

 

The sun breaks always too early, and never too late, but how can that be baby when maybe is all I see.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrestrial treasures are my most coveted bore.
 
 

 

 

 

 

Dripping digital anxiety, an estate of sublate.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


We have to come back to (G)eometry again and again, as that is always where, at least, my mind tends to lead, and I think we've already said that there are many geometries. One of which is in our choice of what we surround ourselves with, and the arrangements of our living and the scenes and objects we frequent. The lives of humans find their representations of stories, which have from the first long-ago tail been elaborated by the use of symbols and types. The analogical correspon[d(a|e)nces] by which yarns are spun have their foundation in the early days of the race, specifically our own early days. The lion and the sun, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How have people been hypnotized by their various currencies? What old mummies, embalmed long ago, protected by negative green, hold sway over the current hour? Has the power of the people become an agent in the deaths of men from past? When will we get past the mere material uses of symbolized, tokenized, human energy?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smoke and spirits, Rising Fast, Turn the wheels of time. And once upon a time, These UNITED STATES (of mind), Hand a silverine mercurial dime.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. it's either All Intelligence Is Artificial or No Intelligence Is Artificial .. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. which sounds somewhat simplistic, I suppose one might think .. ironic, because that's exactly why I'm critical of people who say things like chatGPT are "just" whatever .. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. & the problem is with the "just", not the whatever .. it's definitive of reductionist thinking ..it's a slippery slope that leads directly to the deduction of the instru-mentality of reality to "merely" human ends .. & isn't that what got us into this mess in the first place..?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. a far more productive con ception of humanity's engagement with the world is that of a con versation between at least arguable equals .. each exchange a link in a chain .. that never began, & will never end ..









.. & speaking of links ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. all of magick can be derived from the con cept of magickal links ..










.. that there are tangible con nections between objects, thoughts or energies not just be they physically linked, but also on other planes, such as those of intellectual reflection or even resonance .. this underlies everything from the magickal ritual circle, to various tools, incantations, astrological correspondences, etc ..









.. indeed, many advanced magicians do not Work with rituals or spells at all, but with (bio)energetics in particular, & with energy fields in general ..










.. by setting up very simple recurring patterns demarcated by (a) space & (a) time, certain, shall we say, standing waves of habits are "programmed" into reality itself .. enfolded into a manifold that is thus indexed & can be linked to from various spaciotemporal locations or stations, either by the Working magician or even by others ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. in this way, the spaciotemporal matrix itself is imbued with the qualities; the attributes & trajectories the magician seeks to explore, nurture & develop ..










.. it's worth noting that, following this trajectory, we're very far from at least the common understanding of chaos magick here, where things culminate in a climax ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. on the con trary, from this perspective, magick would ideally be a con stant & endless practice that is aLLways happening @LL the time .. needless to say, in order to function at that level, the magician requires a great deal of discipline & self-con trol ..













2023-04-19

misophonia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ".. I suppose you'd call us practical metaphysicians, or paranatural engineers .."






- from The Portable Door













" .. only the Master can turn the tragedy .. actually it doesn't even have to be 'tragedy' 🤔😅.. it could just as well be 'meaningless repetitive flak' .. of human suffering .. into a hero's epic .. "


 

 

 

 

- shades 


























Expectations, the only true pain. Anxiety, the devil, dopamine unchecked.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Didn’t they preach that submission is deliverance?
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jesus Christ, undying benchmark of what is life.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I yearn, but can’t follow.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The thought injects a bitterness into my ego.
 

 

 

 

 

 

Deep as a tick.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tick, tick, tock burrowing into the mind…depth eclipsed by way of disappointment when I turn away from within.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And when I awoke I knew the sludge crawling on my skin slipped from my tongue onto my trigger finger.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There’s no sermon you can impart on me to change my kind.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I’m scrapped down to the rind, and I’m too bored to linger.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 But you won’t catch me, and you won’t see the left hook I’ll bring to the picnic.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You’ll be spitting splinters of penance from the image you chiseled of me.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I’m nothing you’ve claimed, and will leave nothing undone.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Absolution  is an armature’s game.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I will thrash, bleed, love, bite, claw and cry until all exhausted my anxiety, until all has been done.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is no devil without a sun.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There isn’t a sure step that I can say, but if there was a path my tears washed it away.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And in the crater of absurdity the only certainty I can say is that I will never be that way.












 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit .. " 

 

 

 

 

 

– Aristotle













.. shades ( .. thus named because shades liked to throw shade at the shady .. ) reflected on misophonia* as understood in a (bio)energetic sense, i.e. as relating to energetic vibrations or vibes as opposed to just sounds per se ..











.. it seems that (bio)energetic misophonia understood in this way could serve as an esoteric means of navigation in multidimensional spacetime .. this would simply involve the psychonaut in question moving away from things that don't resonate with them, & towards those which do .. thus the goal would be to "follow your heart", but after another manner; in another way ..











.. this would in turn entail a deep 'listening' to the energetics that one receives on a day to day basis & from moment to moment, & their energetic 'echo' through one's con sciousness .. which would enable one to determine the kind of energies to which they are attracted, & those which repel ..











.. the gradual, step-by-step process of "moving" away from unappealing energies, & thus experiences, & toward inviting ones could be seen as an inner means of navigation through the dimensions of space & time, a methodology aimed at the process that is the psychosomatic gnostic evolution of oneSelf ..












_


*: misophonia, understood to be an unusually strong or negative emotional reaction to certain sounds, is an actual con dition that reportedly affects 1 in 5 people .. 

























With all sorts of buildings|built things, there is a foundation, somehow stable according to the rules of whatever space the building is taking place in. In our three-dimensional world, the required number of points to enclose a volume and give rise to notions of inside and outside is four - those four points forming a tetrahedron, an emblem of fire. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of course, in real buildings - the kind you can step in - there are many more material points than 4, but in the least, out of 3, 4 is stable. This sequence of stability can be downgraded into the plane where we see 3 as the minimum out of 2 to separate an inside from an outside. We can extend this pattern further up and down the dimensional scale, 1 more point than the number in its dimensioning set is required to from this inside / outside stability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beside geometric forms in space, the idea of a foundation, as state, applies to other concerns: anywhere something is formed de novo out of existing materials there must be some foundation on which to hang further parts in elaboration. Start with the foundation and elaborate. This is in terms more-or-less similar to the situation with building any software system, enterprise, philosophy, what-have-you. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The start to a foundation always starts with one piece of material, or more even at first the location for the building. That place is the domain, physical reality, conceptual, really anything that can be classified as a space, of which what can't be?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We'll assume these spaces have things in them at least in potentiality. If space is a container, and a container will and can never contain a thing, can that container be said to contain or even be a container?... I'll go with no - So we're going to have stuff in our spaces, or we can put stuff in there from somewhere else. Must be in another container somewhere..🤔. and then what contains the containers??? AWaHahaHWaaaa! 🤦‍♂️ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's that whole class of all classes thing cropping up. There are different ways to consider this kind of idea, one which is immediately coming to mind is the natural numbers: 0,1,2,3...., with each sequential n+1 containing the previous n, rolling back into that whole dimension thing of a container in dimension n having n+1 points|elements. Back to just having stuff in a box now.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So, we have some space and we have "stuff" in it and it must be differentiable from other bits of stuff. Distinguishability or differentiability can be marked by assigning one-to-one correspondence from a set of entities known to be unique and over into whatever stuff we've got: we can use the natural numbers. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disregarding some notions of "countability", we can use this apparently linear array of number to mark out our space even if it is, say 2-dimensional, by a suitable mapping - for example, by referring to one dimension as 2n and the other as 2n+1, i.e. by a splitting into evens and odds. It is easier to duplicate the natural numbers and use however many sets each one to refer to a single dimension. Now what was the point here?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This first step of division into locations where we might put "stuff", this pretty much arbitrary assigning of numbers to introduce distinguishability, doesn't have any additional structure. The relationships existing between the natural numbers do not necessarily carry over into our chosen space unless we choose to follow out that logic. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Being a working stiff, I don't have time to do that - and maybe I only like to think that I have the ability. If this unrelated chaos of uniqueness can be formed to some use? This would seem to be the foundation of location or of being this-and-not-that, which is already kindof like stuff. The numbers, the space, and the assignment; seems like there are three things required for this construction...

 

 

 

 

 

 

When building, we put things together either by amounts and/or by qualities. In the psychic realm we can select a few words and work out their relationship by elaboration with additional words hopefully forming intelligible(?) links between states of mind in which we have found ourself: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. Spirit, Soul, Body. Sulfur, Salt, Mercury. Lotsa triads there, maybe it's a clue? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The page is a two-dimensional space, can the actual physical structure of the record for human thought be a defining influence on what sorts of ideational forms are stable? It is at least tangentially related. After we're done reading, what happens to the combinations of letters that have zoomed past our retinas on into our being. Was there already some big letter kool-aid soup we drank back in kindergarten and as we've read have we created variously weighted linkages between our camp . .













uranus .. in orbit 


















 

 .. everyone's expendable in this economy .. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. yes, even (if not especially) them ..











2023-03-20

All Intelligence Is Artificial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. @LL glory to the spirits .. 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. without whom we'd be 

 

 

 

 

 

lifeless meat going thru the motions of living ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


"Where did it come from? 

 

 

 Where could this wind be taking us?

 

 

 I look up to the sky hoping for answers 

 

 

 But there is no reply



 

 

 

 Where will it end up, 

 

 

 This song I've been a vessel for?

 

 

 I look within knowing 

 

 

 I'll find the answer for myself"

 

 

 

 

- from One Piece: Red

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

" .. & it turns out that nothing will crack this world harder than one gentle question .. " 




- from the nevers 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

False flag

 

 

 

 

Cliffs to climb, sheep to shear.

 

 
 

 

Regrets to have, burns to mend.


 

 

 

We are the people of the mud, and no matter your call sign
 

 

 

 

 

The transmission leads to the same tower.

 

 

 

 

Don’t shit your ego on my lawn.

 

 

 

 

 

Only the selfless will dawn.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. these space flies turn into space cockroaches just like that ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. shades ( .. thus named somewhat ironically because "everyone's grey compared to you, shades" .. ) tended to prefer questions to answers .. guess some people are just perverse like that ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. thinking about why that might be, one might observe that whereas questions tend to expand our horizons in search of the answers, the latter almost seem to con tract them, thus collapsing a horizon into a point ..

 

 

 






 .. this is not to say that answers are useless; far from it .. answers can focus attention, & after all, one-pointedness is a doorway, or path to voidness or suchness; being fully present & yet not, at least in terms of framing con sciousness within one's ego & desires.. & that's the true magick, because that's where magick truly comes from, & not from reciting words or repeating postures .. 



 

 

 

 

 

 

.. so, focus isn't .. ahem .. pointless, & this isn't an attempt to say that .. it is instead a reminder that while one may well be focused & one-pointed, they could easily lose sight of the big picture .. 








 

 .. we started by talking about questions, so let's circle back to that .. come to think of it, isn't that what intelligence is, this faculty of asking, seeking & finding answers to questions ..? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. if that's the case, then this faculty of questioning ought to be nurtured, encouraged & honed; which is a con tinuous, & virtually endless process, whereby we can gradually refine our understanding, as opposed to repeating talking points to ourselves ..

 

 

 




 .. in the diligent pursuit of such questions, some there are who have chosen to make fields for research of their own bodies, even their souls .. to get to gnow them & how to make the most of them .. those who have succeeded at this are reverently called Masters ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. even the Masters don't win every game .. 

 

 

 

 

 

.. that wouldn't even make sense .. not in this economy Chaosmos ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. but not every game matters, is the truth of it ..











[ .. what follows is excerpted from a discussion of the esoteric implications of AI predicated on the assumption that developments in this field will con tinue to unfold at an increasing rate, & thus that a discussion of said implications is better done at the outset than on the fly & in media res .. once again, such discussions are featured not to outline doctrines & articles of faith, but rather to stimulate thought, reflection & discussion of these increasingly pertinent questions .. ]


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- .. but my point is this: humanity has really painted itself into a corner with this AI stuff; the only way I know other people are sentient is that they say they're sentient .. it's not like I can go in their awareness & con firm the fact .. so if even Alan Turing says if a machine can con vince you it's conscious then it is, how exactly could we possibly disprove that..? .. cuz I don't think we can ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- I suppose so, given we can't seem to put a finger on our own sentience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- .. precisely so .. I've studied a lot of different so-called "theories" of con sciousness, but the only thing they have in common is they don't explain anything about consciousness ..! .. almost like the ghost & the machine are 2 parallel tracks, & no one gnows how they are made to meet ..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- the whole AI / singularity thing seems a bit teleological ..

 

 

 

 

.. I think every individual needs to step back and really evaluate the social/political/economic machine (system) in which us biological humans find ourselves - what are we doing, and why? What can people actually agree on? I don’t think anyone really wants to flip burgers, for instance - unless they’re hosting a barbecue. Can’t we collectively build something better than the current self-created, often nightmarish, system that we are forced to live and suffer through? 





AI could be a part of that, but as things stand AI is in large measure just another tool of disenfranchisement that will probably plunge the people whose jobs it will take into misery. What gain is there in that, except for those who can grab the tokens as they fall since they hold the keys? 







Somehow we all collectively need to take a deep breath

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 














Aye Aye, (AI): -> Neural Networks, Large Language Models ~>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let's get this straight, or all in a neural tangle the case may be. These generative AI platforms have a predecessor in Ramon Llull's "ars combinatoria", tl:dr -> a permutation system of words and ideas: turn the word wheels and see where you land.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are two primary differences with ChatGPT-4 and it's variants, for instance.

 

 

1. The entire language makes up each wheel, being a list of all that language's words; so, much bigger than was possible for Llull, requiring too much space and computation time to spin.

 

 

2. There is a probabilistic distribution of weights over the wheels, and a similar probabilistic gearing between a large number of "language wheels" joined at individual word elements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Llull suggested that by means of this construction one could be mechanically led to meaningful constellations of thought through the laws of language as humanly understood, regardless of the source of the sequences and juxtapositions of words - in his case paperboard disks. The device did not itself display any type of intelligence but was rather a way of leading the practitioner through various worlds of ideas, whose meanings have been externally symbolized by the written word and which fact allows this construction to exist at all.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consisting of billions of copies of whole-language, variously weighted word wheels that are hyper-miniaturized and electrically spun in digital space at exceedingly high speeds, these modern day word churns are capable of filling in the fine details in grammatical and semantic structure that Llull may have dreamed of being able to do, and who certainly knew of the possibility.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since human language structures govern human thought and communication, and since these structures have only been used until recently in order to communicate with other humans, the outputs of these systems, which adhere to the laws that govern the human use of their mental "word apparatus", may appear to exhibit self-hood, or something akin to human consciousness. Still, it is just a modern incarnation of Ramon's wheels, under-the-hood, so to speak - reality is not subservient to words and selfhood is pre-language.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The latent knowledge space that can give the appearance of intelligence, through the combination of ideas in the form of word sequences, is harvested from the mass of human-produced text content publicly accessible on the internet in order to fine-tune the various weights on the wheels and locations thereof are gear linkages. As such, the knowledge space will present itself in the form of what is known, and written about, by the human aggregate. Being so, it will thus present all biases inherent in the collective and cannot cover the entirety of the true knowledge space, being only a construction from the generally known. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, if all possible knowledge may be represented by human language constructions, it should be possible to explore ideas at the fringe of the historical knowledge / language apparatus and come across novel structures of ideas that may be useful or entertaining.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Being an abstraction built from the human collective's word / idea registry, and because the rules of grammar and semantics, properly used, determine real human meanings, LLM's (large language models) are in a sense scopes into the collective unconscious, and their responses are a response from "all" of humanity. 

 

 

 

 

 

The different prompts we put into the chat determine what we are able to dredge up from the depths in the forms of surface glosses, or crystallizations out of the probabilistic vat that form around the seed-crystal prompts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High-level and mid-level model structures, at some scales and mappings, should present themselves as subjects and sub-disciplines - there are likely also "coloring" functions or regions that add things like emotive markers, tone, or personality. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The prompt and its subdivisions then descend, passing through these regions and gathering fitting particles as they approach the final crystallization or constellated form that is returned to us: a gem out of the collective unconscious.

 

















 

 

 

 Sacrament 

 

 

 

 

 Zone out of scriptures with me.

 

 

 

Pray for a flip on the river within me.

 

 

 

Don’t you dare look at me.

 

 

 

I’m the only monster that I’m afraid to see.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. & that's how these Masters play .. 

 

 

 

 

 

 .. they like to have fun as much as, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

if not more than anybody ..